The Political Economy of Supply Chain Transformation in Asia: From “China Plus One” to De-Sinicization

The Political Economy of Supply Chain Transformation in Asia
From “China Plus One” to De-Sinicization

by Keisuke Iida
July 30, 2024

This essay seeks to provide a guidepost for the future of industrial supply chains in East Asia by looking at the “China plus one” model that Japanese multinationals followed in the 2000s and 2010s and assessing the current geoeconomic environment.

Note: This is the first in a series of four essays in 2024–25 on trade and supply chains in Asia made possible by the generous support of the Hinrich Foundation.

DOWNLOAD THIS ESSAY FREE

Executive Summary

MAIN ARGUMENT

In the 2000s and the 2010s, Japanese firms doing business in China coped with a series of foreign policy crises, including waves of anti-Japanese demonstrations and boycotts of Japanese goods and services in China during diplomatic spats between the two countries. Meanwhile, Japanese direct investments in China continued to be strong. The secret to how Japanese corporations managed to survive these crises lies in what is journalistically called “China plus one”: a diversification strategy to expand their supply chains to neighboring countries in Asia. However, the magnitude of the headwinds against Japanese and other multinationals in China began to qualitatively differ in 2017 during the Trump administration. A series of events led the U.S. during the subsequent Biden administration, as well as other advanced economies, to follow a policy of “de-risking”: a transformation of supply chains to minimize risks and increase economic security. The current trend pitting the U.S. and China against each other, if it persists, may gradually turn China-plus-one strategies into “de-Sinicization.”

POLICY IMPLICATIONS
  • China-plus-one strategies allowed Japanese firms in the 2000s and 2010s to maintain their investments and supply chains in China while also expanding into other markets.
  • The current economic landscape is more challenging than earlier years of the 21st century in terms of navigating geopolitical tensions and uncertainty, introducing new technologies, and managing China’s economic slowdown. An increasing number of firms will switch from China plus one to de-Sinicization: an outright reduction in their business presence in China.
  • Chinese corporations are beginning to massively invest in Southeast Asian countries. Hence, the U.S. and Japan must take utmost care to ensure that China will not dominate these Asian countries in the future.

Keisuke Iida is a Professor in the Graduate Schools for Law and Politics at the University of Tokyo (Japan). He specializes in the theory of international political economy, in particular the decision-making processes behind trade policy and the interaction between security and the economy.


About Asia Policy

Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers. Asia Policy is published quarterly in January, April, July, and October and accepts submissions on a rolling basis. Learn more